{"id":49923,"date":"2026-09-11T17:49:04","date_gmt":"2026-09-11T17:49:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alicat.local\/?p=49923"},"modified":"2026-09-11T17:49:04","modified_gmt":"2026-09-11T17:49:04","slug":"halbleiter-messtechnik-inspektionsablauf-druckregelung","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.alicat.com\/de\/articles\/semiconductor-metrology-inspection-flow-pressure-control\/","title":{"rendered":"Durchfluss- und Druckregelung f\u00fcr Mess- und Pr\u00fcfger\u00e4te"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”2em||0px||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_heading title=”Flow and Pressure Control for Semiconductor Metrology and Inspection Tools” _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” custom_css_free_form=”selector h1 {|| text-wrap: pretty;||}” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][\/et_pb_heading][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/www.alicat.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/semiconductor-metrology-inspection-tool.webp” alt=”A cleanroom operator in a bunny suit inspecting a wafer at a microscope-based semiconductor inspection tool” align=”center” force_fullwidth=”on” module_id=”article-hero-image” _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”1.5rem||||false|false” custom_css_free_form=”selector img {|| object-fit: cover;||}” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_divider color=”#2A3B47″ divider_weight=”2.5px” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” height=”0px” custom_margin=”3rem||3rem||true|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][\/et_pb_divider][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px||0px||true|false” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_heading title=”Purge and pressure control inside a metrology tool” _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” title_level=”h2″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][\/et_pb_heading][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||2rem||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

A metrology or inspection tool is built to resolve small differences, and several of the gas positions inside it sit closer to the measurement than they look. In a short-wavelength optical tool, the measurement runs at wavelengths that ordinary air absorbs, so the tool flows nitrogen across its light path to push the oxygen out of the way, down to a few parts per million, where the beam reaches the detector clean. That purge is one of several small gas positions inside one tool, and the same pattern recurs across optical, electron-beam, and probe-based instruments: a flow over an optic, an absolute pressure held in a chamber, a carrier feeding an integrated analyzer. Each runs on its own gas, and each is usually written into the design the way plumbing is: deliver this much, keep it clean.<\/p>\n

But that purge is part of the measurement, not a utility feeding it. Let it run five percent below its setpoint and roughly five percent more oxygen sits in the beam path, and the reading moves with it. The shift is small, and it does not average away: it is the condition the measurement runs under, moving underneath the measurement. It seldom shows on the bench, and turns up months later as a tool that no longer agrees with the data it qualified against, in a fab the builder does not control.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”App Note Header – Challenge” module_class=”article-section-label” _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” header_2_font=”||||||||” header_2_text_color=”#808080″ header_2_font_size=”28px” custom_margin=”||1rem||false|false” custom_css_free_form=”selector span {|| border-bottom: 1px solid #000;|| padding-bottom: 5px;||}” global_module=”46104″ saved_tabs=”all” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

Challenge<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_heading title=”Holding the purge and chamber conditions a measurement depends on” _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” title_level=”h2″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][\/et_pb_heading][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||2rem||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

Two facts force the architecture. The measurement needs a gas environment that is not the ambient one: short-wavelength optical, vacuum-ultraviolet, and extreme-ultraviolet measurements are absorbed by the air they travel through, and depending on wavelength the tool answers that either by evacuating the path or by holding it under a controlled low-absorption atmosphere such as nitrogen, clean dry air, or helium. An electron column or environmental chamber needs a specific absolute pressure instead, because that pressure sets the physics the measurement runs under. And the enclosure holding that environment cannot be sealed and filled once, because it carries beam apertures and wafer-handling openings and its surfaces outgas. The environment has to be maintained continuously by flow, which puts the flow device inside the measurement chain rather than beside it. One tool often carries several such zones: an optical thin-film metrology system may purge its light source, focus housing, illumination and collection optics, main housing, and detector housing separately (US Patent 7,755,764 B2, 2010<\/a>).<\/p>\n

How that flow is arranged carries a consequence a utility specification does not anticipate. The purge runs as a flow-through: inert gas passes through the enclosure continuously and leaves through a vent, and the box is held slightly above ambient pressure so leakage is always outward and room air cannot diffuse back in through the apertures. The through-flow does the diluting; the slight positive pressure keeps air from returning. The residual is roughly the in-leak divided by the flow, so flushing harder both drives it down and blunts what a flow error does to it. But the flow cannot run arbitrarily high: purge gas costs money, helium especially, and a strong flow over the optics brings its own vibration and thermal gradients. So it settles at a bounded target flow, one the same purge-control design steps up for vacuum-ultraviolet measurements and back down for UV-visible ones. At that operating point the in-leak term is a live part of the contamination budget, and a wander in the flow moves the residual, and with it the reading at the detector.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_heading title=”What instability costs once the fleet is installed” _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” title_level=”h3″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][\/et_pb_heading][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||2rem||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

A purge or pressure wander does not stay in the gas system. It enters the reading as baseline drift, which sits underneath the tool’s repeatability and cannot be averaged away, because it is not noise. The distinction between accuracy and repeatability is the one that matters. A fixed accuracy offset is absorbed when the tool builder characterizes the system as built. A repeatability or drift term is not: it moves between runs, between power cycles, and between one instrument and the next on the production line, and nothing at tool level is positioned to catch it.<\/p>\n

It costs the OEM again after shipment. The instrument is calibrated on a bench, boxed, and installed in a fab the tool builder does not control, and a drift in the gas control does not arrive looking like a gas fault. It looks like a tool that no longer matches the data it qualified against, and the first hours of diagnosis go to the optics or the detector. The correction is a service visit to the fab, and across a fleet it is that same visit many times over. Reproducible configuration and stability over the tool’s field life are reliability requirements here.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||3rem||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

\t<\/p>\n
Rule of thumb<\/div>\n

\tSize a purge controller so the tool’s normal operating flow sits near the middle of its range, not at the bottom. Repeatability carries a percent-of-full-scale term alongside a percent-of-reading term, and the full-scale term dominates once a position runs at a few percent of range. Choosing a full scale to leave headroom for a flow the tool will never use puts the position in exactly that region.<\/pee><\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”App Note Header – Options” module_class=”article-section-label” _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” header_2_font=”||||||||” header_2_text_color=”#808080″ header_2_font_size=”28px” custom_margin=”||1rem||false|false” custom_css_free_form=”selector span {|| border-bottom: 1px solid #000;|| padding-bottom: 5px;||}” global_module=”46105″ saved_tabs=”all” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

Options<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_heading title=”Specifying each gas position in the tool” _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” title_level=”h2″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][\/et_pb_heading][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||2rem||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

The positions below recur across optical, electron-beam, and probe-based tools. Each is small, and each is usually specified on its own, which is how a tool ends up with four part numbers holding four flows that behave differently. Reading them together shows where one family covers the set and where a position needs something else.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n
Table 1. Gas positions that recur across metrology and inspection tools, and what decides the instrument at each. Full-scale range, fittings, and communications are configuration choices made per tool.<\/caption>\n

\t\t<\/p>\n

Position in the tool<\/th>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

What it has to hold<\/th>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

What it has to report<\/th>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

What usually decides the pick<\/th>\n

\t\t\t<\/tr>\n

\t\t<\/thead>\n

\t\t<\/p>\n

Optic and detector purge<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

A low flow, steadily and continuously, over a beam path or a detector window.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Flow, and the pressure it is delivering against.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Repeatability at the low end of the range, and how much inlet pressure the purge feed can spare.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t<\/tr>\n

\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Measurement chamber backfill<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Either a flow into a pumped volume, or the chamber’s absolute pressure directly.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Flow and absolute pressure, referenced to vacuum.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Whether the tool controls pressure as the variable, or controls flow and lets pressure settle against the pumps.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t<\/tr>\n

\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Sample and carrier flow to an integrated analyzer<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

A stable carrier or sample flow, held across a run.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Flow and temperature.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Run-to-run repeatability, because the analyzer’s own calibration assumes the carrier flow did not move.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t<\/tr>\n

\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Probe and characterization environment<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

A conditioned gas environment around the device under test.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Flow and absolute pressure.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

How many gases the position runs, and how often they change.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t<\/tr>\n

\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Field and lab verification<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Nothing. This position measures rather than controls.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Traceable flow, on battery, wherever the tool is installed.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Calibration traceability and portability, not control performance.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t<\/tr>\n

\t\t<\/tbody>\n

\t<\/table>\n

<\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_code][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||2rem||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

Several instrument classes hold these conditions competently. A fixed restriction on a regulated supply is right for a purge that keeps particulate off a housing at one condition; a thermal mass flow controller holds these flows well, and on the inert gases these tools run its accuracy matches the alternatives here; a pressure held upstream of a characterized orifice is fast and proven where the gas never changes. What separates them at design-in is not which controls better, but how much of the required reporting a single instrument covers, and how many part numbers the tool carries as a result.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”App Note Header – Selection” module_class=”article-section-label” _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” header_2_font=”||||||||” header_2_text_color=”#808080″ header_2_font_size=”28px” custom_margin=”||1rem||false|false” custom_css_free_form=”selector span {|| border-bottom: 1px solid #000;|| padding-bottom: 5px;||}” global_module=”46106″ saved_tabs=”all” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

Selection<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_heading title=”Consolidate onto measured, self-reporting instruments” _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” title_level=”h2″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][\/et_pb_heading][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||2rem||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

Most of these positions control a flow: the optic purge, the chamber backfill, the sample carrier. Hold them with a measured flow controller and the reporting problem answers itself. A laminar differential-pressure controller derives flow from an absolute pressure and a temperature it measures inside its own body, and it reports all three as outputs, so the conditions behind each reading are logged without a second device. That is what makes a later drift attributable: when the flow held while the supply moved, or the flow moved while the supply held, the tool reads the difference from its own logs.<\/p>\n

One measured flow controller also collapses the part count across those positions. Gas properties come from an on-board library evaluated against the instrument’s own measured pressure and temperature, so changing the active gas is a direct selection, and the optic purge and the sample carrier land on a single configuration that differs only in full-scale range and the gas selected. The controller’s published repeatability is small against the drift budgets these tools work to, so the gas control is no longer the largest error term in the measurement. The measurement chamber joins those flow positions whenever its gas is run as a backfill against the pumps; what sets it apart is that its pressure can be the measurement condition itself, and then it is held differently.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

\t<\/p>\n
\t\t<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFacility gas<\/text>\t\t\tN₂ · CDA · He · O₂<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\tRegulator<\/text>\t\t\tand filter<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\tPurge flow<\/text>\t\t\tcontrol<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\tSample carrier<\/text>\t\t\tflow control<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\tChamber pressure<\/text>\t\t\tcontrol<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\tPurged optical path<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\tIntegrated analyzer<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\tMeasurement chamber<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\tVacuum pumps<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tflow, absolute pressure,<\/text>\t\t\ttemperature<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\tTool controls and data record<\/text>\t\t<\/svg>\t\t<\/div>\n

\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSHARED FACILITY-GAS SUPPLY<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFacility gas<\/text>\t\t\t\tN₂ · CDA · He · O₂<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tRegulator<\/text>\t\t\t\tand filter<\/text>\t\t\t<\/svg>\t\t\t<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\tOPTIC AND DETECTOR PURGE<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tPurge flow<\/text>\t\t\t\tcontrol<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tTool controls<\/text>\t\t\t\tand data record<\/text>\t\t\t\tflow, absolute pressure,<\/text>\t\t\t\ttemperature<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tPurged optical path<\/text>\t\t\t<\/svg>\t\t\t\tSAMPLE AND CARRIER FLOW<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSample carrier<\/text>\t\t\t\tflow control<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tTool controls<\/text>\t\t\t\tand data record<\/text>\t\t\t\tflow, absolute pressure,<\/text>\t\t\t\ttemperature<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tIntegrated analyzer<\/text>\t\t\t<\/svg>\t\t\t\tMEASUREMENT CHAMBER PRESSURE<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tChamber pressure<\/text>\t\t\t\tcontrol<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tTool controls<\/text>\t\t\t\tand data record<\/text>\t\t\t\tflow, absolute pressure,<\/text>\t\t\t\ttemperature<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tMeasurement<\/text>\t\t\t\tchamber<\/text>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tVacuum pumps<\/text>\t\t\t<\/svg>\t\t\t<\/div>\n

\t\t<\/div>\n

\t<\/div>\n

Figure 1. Gas positions common to optical, electron-beam, and probe-based metrology and inspection tools: an optic purge, a sample-carrier flow, and the measurement-chamber pressure. A given tool may carry only some of these, and the number of purged zones varies by design. The chamber is drawn under direct pressure control; it may instead be held by a backfill flow against the pumps. The red dashed path is the reported reading, not a gas line.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

[\/et_pb_code][et_pb_heading title=”Holding the measurement chamber’s pressure” _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” title_level=”h3″ module_id=”chamber-pressure” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][\/et_pb_heading][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||2rem||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

When the chamber’s pressure is the measurement condition itself, it is the quantity that has to be held to spec, referenced to vacuum rather than to the local atmosphere, which moves with the weather and the fab’s air handling. Variable-pressure and environmental electron microscope chambers run orders of magnitude below atmosphere, with environmental modes commonly reaching roughly 1 to 20 Torr and up to about 50 Torr on some instruments. That pressure governs how much of the beam scatters out of the focused probe before it reaches the sample, so it trades charge neutralization against resolution, and the tool has to record where on that trade each image was taken.<\/p>\n

It can be held two ways, both with a measured instrument. On a continuously pumped chamber, a flow controller admits gas against the pumps and the pressure settles where inlet flow balances pumping speed; the same flow controller can control on its own absolute pressure rather than on flow, so it holds the pressure directly while staying the instrument already used across the tool’s flow positions. On a closed or dead-ended chamber where the gas has no natural exhaust, or where the pressure has to be held more tightly than a flow settling against the pumps can manage, a dual-valve pressure controller belongs there instead: it admits and vents to hold the setpoint directly and without a continuous bleed, reaches into the Torr region, and references the pressure to vacuum. Its accuracy is published on full scale rather than on reading, so the full-scale range is chosen to sit near the operating pressure.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||2rem||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

\t<\/p>\n
When this is not the right tool<\/div>\n

\tConstrained purge inlet pressure.<\/strong> The laminar element is a restriction and takes its pressure drop from whatever the supply provides. A standard gas body in the 100 to 500 SCCM class drops 1.0 PSID at full scale, and that climbs with full scale. Where the purge feed sits near atmospheric with no headroom to give away, the low-pressure-drop variant of the same architecture drops as little as 0.07 PSID; below that, a passive restriction or a pressure-driven approach belongs there instead.<\/pee>\t<\/p>\n

\tA purge that is genuinely housekeeping.<\/strong> Where the gas keeps particulate off a housing at one fixed condition and nothing about it enters the measurement, a fixed restriction on a regulated supply is the honest answer. An instrumented position there is cost and firmware the tool does not need, and it adds a failure mode where there was none.<\/pee><\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_code][et_pb_code _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n
Table 2. Family-level capabilities that trace to the positions and problem elements above. Figures are from the published MC-Series specification (DOC-SPECS-MC-MID, Rev 6, July 2025).<\/caption>\n

\t\t<\/p>\n

Family-level capability<\/th>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

What it does for the tool<\/th>\n

\t\t\t<\/tr>\n

\t\t<\/thead>\n

\t\t<\/p>\n

±(0.1% of reading + 0.02% of full scale) flow repeatability, 2σ, in the mid-flow ranges; ±(0.2% of reading + 0.02% of full scale) in the low and high-flow ranges<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

The term a tool-level calibration cannot absorb, so it sets run-to-run stability of the purged signal path.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t<\/tr>\n

\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Typical warm-up under one second<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

The position measures as soon as the tool powers up, so startup does not schedule around the gas control.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t<\/tr>\n

\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Mass flow, volumetric flow, absolute pressure, and temperature from one body<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

The tool logs conditions behind each measurement from a single port, which is what makes a later drift attributable.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t<\/tr>\n

\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Steady-state control range of 0.01 to 100% of full scale<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

One configuration covers low optic-purge flow and higher backfill demand without a second part number.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t<\/tr>\n

\t\t\t<\/p>\n

98 to 130 preloaded gas calibrations, resident on the instrument and selected directly<\/td>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

One configuration serves nitrogen, clean dry air, helium, and oxygen positions, consolidating several small gas jobs onto one platform.<\/td>\n

\t\t\t<\/tr>\n

\t\t<\/tbody>\n

\t<\/table>\n

<\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_code][et_pb_code _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||2rem||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

\tThe MC-Series is Alicat’s implementation of the laminar differential-pressure architecture, with the absolute pressure and temperature sensors that derivation requires reporting as outputs alongside the flow. It is recommended for the optic purge, chamber backfill, and sample carrier, and, controlling on its own absolute pressure, holds the chamber pressure on a continuously pumped chamber; the PCD-Series takes over where the chamber is closed or dead-ended and the gas has no natural exhaust, or where the pressure must be held very precisely. Configuration, meaning full-scale range, fittings, communications, and materials, is selected with applications engineering.<\/pee><\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_code][et_pb_code _builder_version=”4.27.7″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n

\t<\/p>\n
\t\t\"Alicat\t<\/div>\n

\t<\/p>\n

\t\t<\/p>\n
MC-Series · Mass Flow Controllers<\/div>\n

\t\t<\/p>\n

MC-Series Mass Flow Controllers<\/h3>\n

\t\tOptic purge, sample carrier, and chamber backfill or pressure<\/pee>\t\tLaminar differential-pressure mass flow controllers for the low, steady flows a measurement tool depends on, across the optic purge, sample carrier, and chamber backfill. The same instrument can control on its own absolute pressure rather than on flow, so on a continuously pumped chamber it holds the chamber pressure without adding a second device.<\/pee>\t\t<\/p>\n